Thursday, December 3, 2009

Which is better, FIBA Rule or NBA style of basketball??

i've watched both the NBA and games played using Fiba rule. i think Fiba rule is much better in terms of offense and defense. plus, it's been years since an NBA team won against a tough european team under fiba rules. what do you think?



Which is better, FIBA Rule or NBA style of basketball??nba news





oh definetely FIBA rules without a doubt, and maybe if the NBA learned the style of eurpean basketball, they might win a game or two in the olympics. you didnt see those teams having dunk highlights...but what did you see. three ball after three ball, and sweet easy passes for baskets. thats how you win. a dunk is nice, a three sixty is amazing...but u are not going to get more than 2 points for a dunk, its just like a layup.



Which is better, FIBA Rule or NBA style of basketball??nba all star game ,nba teams



Also, 3 point line is shorter in FIBA, so more frequent 3s make for a high paced offense.
The problem with NBA rules is the restricted zone. Defenders get called for defensive fouls even though it's the offense who charged. Sure, the restricted bring more dunks, but who cares? I want to see real basketball skills because any tall guys can dunk! And in FIBA and the Olympics, that's why USA lost. Players kept on being called for offensive fouls inside their supposed restricted area that doesn't exist internationally. I don't mind the NBA moving the 3 point line back 2 feet, because that means the players must be more accurate. But that restricted zone is destroying the art of real basketball. Anything that restricts a defender from doing his job should be taken out. That's why people rather watch NCAAB! David Stern need to correct this.

No comments:

Post a Comment

 
phone